Review



muc2 immunohistochemical staining  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals muc2 immunohistochemical staining
    Muc2 Immunohistochemical Staining, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/muc2 immunohistochemical staining/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    muc2 immunohistochemical staining - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Proteintech immunohistochemical staining
    Immunohistochemical Staining, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/immunohistochemical staining/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    immunohistochemical staining - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Novus Biologicals muc2 immunohistochemical staining
    Muc2 Immunohistochemical Staining, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/muc2 immunohistochemical staining/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    muc2 immunohistochemical staining - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology immunofluorescent staining for muc2
    Immunofluorescent Staining For Muc2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/immunofluorescent staining for muc2/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    immunofluorescent staining for muc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals staining for muc2
    Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ( A – E ) and immunofluorescence of <t>Mucin</t> <t>2</t> <t>(Muc2;</t> mucous-forming protein) ( F – J ) in proximal colon in all experimental groups. Histological scores ( K ) were highest in MS, demonstrated injury in MS compared to control. Treatment with Antalarmin and Astressin prevented this MS-induced colonic injury, but not by Astressin-2β. Crypt length in μm ( L ) (red lines in photomicrographs A – E ) and the number of Muc2+ goblet cells per crypt ( M ) were reduced by MS compared to control, and restored to control levels following Antalarmin and Astressin treatment. Astressin-2β did not prevent these MS-induced effects. Myeloperoxidase (MPO; μmol/mg protein) expression was increased in MS group and was reduced to a level similar to control by treatment with Antalarmin but not by treatment with Astressin or Astressin-2β ( N ). Western blot analysis of NF-κB showed an increase in the phosphorylated expression of NF-κB in MS, which was prevented by Antalarmin administration, but not by Astressin or Astressin-2β ( O , P ). Trans-cellular flux of HRP (ng/ml.cm2.min; Q ) measured by Ussing Chamber was increased in MS and MS + Astressin-2β groups, compared to control, but not in MS + Antalarmin and MS + Astressin groups ( P ). Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
    Staining For Muc2, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/staining for muc2/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    staining for muc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology staining for muc2
    Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ( A – E ) and immunofluorescence of <t>Mucin</t> <t>2</t> <t>(Muc2;</t> mucous-forming protein) ( F – J ) in proximal colon in all experimental groups. Histological scores ( K ) were highest in MS, demonstrated injury in MS compared to control. Treatment with Antalarmin and Astressin prevented this MS-induced colonic injury, but not by Astressin-2β. Crypt length in μm ( L ) (red lines in photomicrographs A – E ) and the number of Muc2+ goblet cells per crypt ( M ) were reduced by MS compared to control, and restored to control levels following Antalarmin and Astressin treatment. Astressin-2β did not prevent these MS-induced effects. Myeloperoxidase (MPO; μmol/mg protein) expression was increased in MS group and was reduced to a level similar to control by treatment with Antalarmin but not by treatment with Astressin or Astressin-2β ( N ). Western blot analysis of NF-κB showed an increase in the phosphorylated expression of NF-κB in MS, which was prevented by Antalarmin administration, but not by Astressin or Astressin-2β ( O , P ). Trans-cellular flux of HRP (ng/ml.cm2.min; Q ) measured by Ussing Chamber was increased in MS and MS + Astressin-2β groups, compared to control, but not in MS + Antalarmin and MS + Astressin groups ( P ). Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
    Staining For Muc2, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/staining for muc2/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    staining for muc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti muc2 staining
    Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ( A – E ) and immunofluorescence of <t>Mucin</t> <t>2</t> <t>(Muc2;</t> mucous-forming protein) ( F – J ) in proximal colon in all experimental groups. Histological scores ( K ) were highest in MS, demonstrated injury in MS compared to control. Treatment with Antalarmin and Astressin prevented this MS-induced colonic injury, but not by Astressin-2β. Crypt length in μm ( L ) (red lines in photomicrographs A – E ) and the number of Muc2+ goblet cells per crypt ( M ) were reduced by MS compared to control, and restored to control levels following Antalarmin and Astressin treatment. Astressin-2β did not prevent these MS-induced effects. Myeloperoxidase (MPO; μmol/mg protein) expression was increased in MS group and was reduced to a level similar to control by treatment with Antalarmin but not by treatment with Astressin or Astressin-2β ( N ). Western blot analysis of NF-κB showed an increase in the phosphorylated expression of NF-κB in MS, which was prevented by Antalarmin administration, but not by Astressin or Astressin-2β ( O , P ). Trans-cellular flux of HRP (ng/ml.cm2.min; Q ) measured by Ussing Chamber was increased in MS and MS + Astressin-2β groups, compared to control, but not in MS + Antalarmin and MS + Astressin groups ( P ). Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
    Anti Muc2 Staining, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti muc2 staining/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti muc2 staining - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Blackwell Science Ltd staining score for muc2
    Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ( A – E ) and immunofluorescence of <t>Mucin</t> <t>2</t> <t>(Muc2;</t> mucous-forming protein) ( F – J ) in proximal colon in all experimental groups. Histological scores ( K ) were highest in MS, demonstrated injury in MS compared to control. Treatment with Antalarmin and Astressin prevented this MS-induced colonic injury, but not by Astressin-2β. Crypt length in μm ( L ) (red lines in photomicrographs A – E ) and the number of Muc2+ goblet cells per crypt ( M ) were reduced by MS compared to control, and restored to control levels following Antalarmin and Astressin treatment. Astressin-2β did not prevent these MS-induced effects. Myeloperoxidase (MPO; μmol/mg protein) expression was increased in MS group and was reduced to a level similar to control by treatment with Antalarmin but not by treatment with Astressin or Astressin-2β ( N ). Western blot analysis of NF-κB showed an increase in the phosphorylated expression of NF-κB in MS, which was prevented by Antalarmin administration, but not by Astressin or Astressin-2β ( O , P ). Trans-cellular flux of HRP (ng/ml.cm2.min; Q ) measured by Ussing Chamber was increased in MS and MS + Astressin-2β groups, compared to control, but not in MS + Antalarmin and MS + Astressin groups ( P ). Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
    Staining Score For Muc2, supplied by Blackwell Science Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/staining score for muc2/product/Blackwell Science Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    staining score for muc2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ( A – E ) and immunofluorescence of Mucin 2 (Muc2; mucous-forming protein) ( F – J ) in proximal colon in all experimental groups. Histological scores ( K ) were highest in MS, demonstrated injury in MS compared to control. Treatment with Antalarmin and Astressin prevented this MS-induced colonic injury, but not by Astressin-2β. Crypt length in μm ( L ) (red lines in photomicrographs A – E ) and the number of Muc2+ goblet cells per crypt ( M ) were reduced by MS compared to control, and restored to control levels following Antalarmin and Astressin treatment. Astressin-2β did not prevent these MS-induced effects. Myeloperoxidase (MPO; μmol/mg protein) expression was increased in MS group and was reduced to a level similar to control by treatment with Antalarmin but not by treatment with Astressin or Astressin-2β ( N ). Western blot analysis of NF-κB showed an increase in the phosphorylated expression of NF-κB in MS, which was prevented by Antalarmin administration, but not by Astressin or Astressin-2β ( O , P ). Trans-cellular flux of HRP (ng/ml.cm2.min; Q ) measured by Ussing Chamber was increased in MS and MS + Astressin-2β groups, compared to control, but not in MS + Antalarmin and MS + Astressin groups ( P ). Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Inhibition of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 and activation of receptor 2 protect against colonic injury and promote epithelium repair

    doi: 10.1038/srep46616

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained ( A – E ) and immunofluorescence of Mucin 2 (Muc2; mucous-forming protein) ( F – J ) in proximal colon in all experimental groups. Histological scores ( K ) were highest in MS, demonstrated injury in MS compared to control. Treatment with Antalarmin and Astressin prevented this MS-induced colonic injury, but not by Astressin-2β. Crypt length in μm ( L ) (red lines in photomicrographs A – E ) and the number of Muc2+ goblet cells per crypt ( M ) were reduced by MS compared to control, and restored to control levels following Antalarmin and Astressin treatment. Astressin-2β did not prevent these MS-induced effects. Myeloperoxidase (MPO; μmol/mg protein) expression was increased in MS group and was reduced to a level similar to control by treatment with Antalarmin but not by treatment with Astressin or Astressin-2β ( N ). Western blot analysis of NF-κB showed an increase in the phosphorylated expression of NF-κB in MS, which was prevented by Antalarmin administration, but not by Astressin or Astressin-2β ( O , P ). Trans-cellular flux of HRP (ng/ml.cm2.min; Q ) measured by Ussing Chamber was increased in MS and MS + Astressin-2β groups, compared to control, but not in MS + Antalarmin and MS + Astressin groups ( P ). Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

    Article Snippet: Staining for Muc2 (NB120-11197, Novus Biologicals, CO) and Ki67 (ab15580, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA) was performed to measure epithelial goblet cell numbers and enterocyte proliferation, respectively.

    Techniques: Staining, Immunofluorescence, Control, Expressing, Western Blot

    Fluorescent micrographs of intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5 ( A – E , blue arrows) and cell proliferation marker Ki67 ( F – J ) in colonic tissues of the experimental groups. Lgr5 positive cells expressing Ki67 are shown in higher magnification ( K – N , yellow arrows). Co-localization of Lgr5 and Ki67 markers in the intestine of pups subjected to MS suggested that Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells are proliferative. Relative gene expressions of Lgr5 ( O ) and the number of Ki67+ proliferating cells per crypt (P) in the colon were significantly increased by MS compared to control, and this increase was observed when Antalarmin was administered. In contrast, this increase was prevented by pre-treatment with both Astressin and Astressin-2β. Relative gene expressions of epithelial differentiation marker Muc2 ( Q ) and Lyz1 ( R ) are shown, The MS-induced decrease in Muc2 and Lyz1 expression was rescued by Antalarmin and Astressin, but not Astressin-2β. Relative gene expression IL-22 ( S ) and western blot of phosphorylated STAT3 ( U ) are shown. IL-22 and phosphorylated STAT3 increased in the MS group compared to the control; however, these elevations were both inhibited by Astressin and Astressin-2β, indicating the important role of CRHR2 in tissue repair in response to MS-induced injury. Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Inhibition of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 and activation of receptor 2 protect against colonic injury and promote epithelium repair

    doi: 10.1038/srep46616

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fluorescent micrographs of intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5 ( A – E , blue arrows) and cell proliferation marker Ki67 ( F – J ) in colonic tissues of the experimental groups. Lgr5 positive cells expressing Ki67 are shown in higher magnification ( K – N , yellow arrows). Co-localization of Lgr5 and Ki67 markers in the intestine of pups subjected to MS suggested that Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells are proliferative. Relative gene expressions of Lgr5 ( O ) and the number of Ki67+ proliferating cells per crypt (P) in the colon were significantly increased by MS compared to control, and this increase was observed when Antalarmin was administered. In contrast, this increase was prevented by pre-treatment with both Astressin and Astressin-2β. Relative gene expressions of epithelial differentiation marker Muc2 ( Q ) and Lyz1 ( R ) are shown, The MS-induced decrease in Muc2 and Lyz1 expression was rescued by Antalarmin and Astressin, but not Astressin-2β. Relative gene expression IL-22 ( S ) and western blot of phosphorylated STAT3 ( U ) are shown. IL-22 and phosphorylated STAT3 increased in the MS group compared to the control; however, these elevations were both inhibited by Astressin and Astressin-2β, indicating the important role of CRHR2 in tissue repair in response to MS-induced injury. Results are means, ±SD. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

    Article Snippet: Staining for Muc2 (NB120-11197, Novus Biologicals, CO) and Ki67 (ab15580, Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA) was performed to measure epithelial goblet cell numbers and enterocyte proliferation, respectively.

    Techniques: Marker, Expressing, Control, Gene Expression, Western Blot